As electrical systems age, operating costs increase while reliability dwindles. Given most utilities and industrial facilities are highly capital intensive and have limited financial and other resources to make wholesale equipment replacements, regular maintenance is critical for controlling the symptoms of aging.
Maintenance is a key part of lifecycle asset management. Preserving equipment health maximizes the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of substation assets, including transformers, circuit breakers, protection equipment, CTs, PTs, CCVTs, batteries, transmission lines, and more. Effective maintenance also helps minimize lifecycle and insurance-related costs, accidents, and environmental compliance issues, reduce the risk of unplanned shutdowns and negative publicity, and ultimately extend the life of an asset.
The Evolution of Maintenance Practices
Utilities have long relied on three types of maintenance techniques: let assets run until they fail, maintain assets only when absolutely necessary, or implement a fixed maintenance schedule. But these approaches alone don’t provide the level of protection that is necessary to extend the lifecycle to today’s substations.
Today, the best maintenance approaches combine two or three of the following strategies:
Time-based maintenance (TBM): Involves testing at specific intervals.
Condition-based maintenance (CBM): The amount of maintenance performed, and the interval, is based on the condition of the asset.
Performance-based maintenance (PBM): Extends TBM test time intervals by analyzing records showing low failure rates of particular equipment families receiving TBM. This approach is also often referred to as reliability-centered maintenance (RCM).
Due to tremendous advances in both on-line and off-line diagnostics, CBM has really taken hold over the years. On-line dissolved gas analysis, sweep frequency response analysis, automated tracking of faults, and analyzing on-line winding temperature and monitoring of moisture within the insulation all provide the information needed to perform CBM and can result in significant savings compared to time-based maintenance strategies. The benefit of CBM is that when conducted properly, the approach enables utilities to identify and fix issues as soon as they fail, without having to deal with lengthy and costly downtime. Teams also don’t have to worry about the risk of damage or human error and can free up employees’ time for critical initiatives like asset replacement and problem solving.